📖 About This Book · Ovington's Bank - by Stanley J. Weyman
First published in London in 1922 by John Murray
Setting: Aldersbury, 1825 – the speculative mania before the financial panic.
Key Themes: class and social mobility · financial speculation · integrity vs. ambition · love and sacrifice.
Major Characters: Arthur Bourdillon (ambitious, charming) · Clement Ovington (honest, nature-loving) · Josina Griffin (the Squire's daughter) · Squire Griffin (proud, blind) · Charles Ovington (self-made banker) · Rodd (loyal cashier).
Plot Arc: The novel follows the rise and fall of a speculative bank, interwoven with a romantic plot. Arthur's ambition leads him to fraud; Clement's honesty redeems him; the Squire's pride is humbled; love triumphs over prejudice.
Summary
- On a Sunday morning, Arthur arrives late at Garthmyle Church and finds the Squire's pew occupied only by Josina. He slips in beside her—but the Squire arrives behind him, trapping him there.
- After the service, the Squire invites Arthur to dinner at Garth. A tense conversation follows: the Squire demands Arthur choose between the Church (and the Garthmyle living) and the bank.
- Arthur argues for the changing times—men are making fortunes in trade and buying estates. The Squire is contemptuous: banking is "usury," and Arthur would be a "Griffin with dirty hands."
- After dinner, the Squire summons Josina and forbids her from encouraging Arthur. He makes it clear that she is his to give or withhold—and that Arthur's suit is conditional on his obedience.
- Josina retreats to her room in tears—not only from her father's tyranny, but because she suspects Arthur's interest in her is shallow and strategic.
Analysis
- The Old Order vs. the New: The Squire's contempt for "trade" and "usury" is fully revealed. He represents the old landed gentry, resisting the rise of commercial wealth.
- Patriarchal Tyranny: The Squire treats Josina as property—she is to be given or withheld as he pleases. This reflects the legal and social reality of the period.
- Arthur's Pragmatism: Arthur argues for social mobility and defends the new commercial class, but his interest in Josina is clearly strategic—she is the heiress to Garth.
- Josina's Doubt: She suspects Arthur's feelings are not genuine. This sets up the contrast with Clement, whose love for her will prove deeper and more sincere.
Peel, Pitt, and Coutts — three names that represent the rise of the new commercial and financial class, which the Squire despises.
Sir Robert Peel (1788–1850) was a politician, the son of a wealthy cotton manufacturer. His rise to power (he became Home Secretary in 1822) symbolised the new industrial elite taking over government. To the Squire, Peel was a "money-bag" upstart.
William Pitt the Younger (1759–1806) was Prime Minister. He was a "Pitt's money-bag peer" in the Squire's mind, because he created peers from commercial families, diluting the old aristocracy.
Thomas Coutts (1735–1822) was a banker and founder of Coutts & Co. He was the archetypal self-made man, rising from modest beginnings to immense wealth. He became a byword for the new banking class.
In the novel, the Squire uses these names as symbols of everything he hates: the rise of commerce, the decline of the old landed order, and the erosion of traditional power by new money.
A coach and four was a horse-drawn carriage pulled by four horses, driven by a coachman with postilions (riders) on the lead horses. It was the ultimate symbol of wealth and status in the Regency era—only the very rich could afford to own and maintain such a vehicle.
When the Squire accuses Arthur of wanting to "drive your coach and four into Aldersbury," he's mocking his ambition to rise above his station. In the old order, a coach and four was the privilege of the landed gentry. For a tradesman or banker to own one was seen as vulgar pretension.
No comments:
Post a Comment